• OpenStars@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Roughly one year ago, you say? Gee, I wonder what could possibly have happened roughly one year ago, hrm? Can’t really think of anything particularly memorable that happened roughly one year in the past… [them, OP and all the commenters]

      • OpenStars@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        That is when Reddit starts selling Reddit Premium to not sell all your data, bc fuck all you all apparently, according to spez.

        Edit: holy shit that may have already just started.

  • shneancy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    yeah now whenever i visit reddit (when i run out of fresh lemmy content) i constantly see things i would rather not. I’m doing my best to limit my “bad news and shit happenings” exposure and reddit recommends i watch all the tragic traffic accidents when people post them to r/maybemaybemaybe, right inbetween the freshest news from the genocide frontlines, and the newest bullshit coming from American politicians

  • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    strategy as old as the day when some corporate ghoul clocked that more engagement = more ad time. facebook is probably the worst offender with youtube being a close second

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Downvoting to indicate you’re not interested is not how it works (or worked). Same for Lemmy.

    *I’m saying that voting doesn’t impact your feed in the way of “show me more like this” or “show me less of this”.

    • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Unfortunately so. The original goal of downvotes in the reddiquette used to say that downvotes were meant for posts and comments that were uninteresting/spam and didn’t contribute to the discussion, but unfortunately most people use it to shut down viewpoints they don’t agree with.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Reddit had, historically, been pretty good about the first few posts in an article complementing or rebutting the headline (particularly when the OP is controversial). Now the degree of fake engagement has made that harder to come by, simply because its hard to procedurally generate a rational set of ideas.

        But in more insular and criticism-hostile communities, you’d regularly see a “Fuck <Thing We All Don’t Like>” as the most upvoted comment, with any critique or nuance buried under a hill of downvotes. You’ll also see some variation of Fed-jacking/Bot-tagging used to rebut any thoughtful criticism.

        In fairness, we see it around here, too. People get dogpiled for having an .ml source account. People get tagged as “Russian Bot” or “CCP Tankie” for expressing the least bit of criticism of US/UK foreign policy. There’s just an orgy of hate in social media, even in areas that don’t explicitly encourage it.

        Reddiquette doesn’t work when you see in-group shitposts as positive contributions and outsider critiques as inconsequential spam. Doubly so when the mods are pushing a particular agenda.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh, so like every other media out there? Using controversial content to incite outrage to get more clicks and reactions?

    God I’m so tired of this shit.

    News on TV, on the internet, in newspapers, posts on all sorts of social media, it’s all the same outrage BS.