ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoJPEG is Dying - And that's a bad thing | 2kliksphilipwww.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkJPEG is Dying - And that's a bad thing | 2kliksphilipwww.youtube.comProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square12fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
minus-squareredisdead@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoThe issue with jpegxl is that in reality jpeg is fine for 99% of images on the internet. If you need lossless, you can have PNG. “But JPEGXL can save 0,18mb in compression!” Shut up nerd everyone has broadband it doesn’t matter
minus-squareAdrianTheFrog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoCheck how large your photos library is on your computer. Now wouldn’t it be nice if it was 40% smaller?
minus-squareredisdead@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·1 month agoI have several TBs of storage. I don’t remember the last time I paid attention to it. I don’t even use jpeg for it. I have all the raw pics from my DSLR and lossless PNGs for stuff I edited. It’s quite literally a non issue. Storage is cheap af.
The issue with jpegxl is that in reality jpeg is fine for 99% of images on the internet.
If you need lossless, you can have PNG.
“But JPEGXL can save 0,18mb in compression!” Shut up nerd everyone has broadband it doesn’t matter
Check how large your photos library is on your computer. Now wouldn’t it be nice if it was 40% smaller?
I have several TBs of storage. I don’t remember the last time I paid attention to it.
I don’t even use jpeg for it. I have all the raw pics from my DSLR and lossless PNGs for stuff I edited.
It’s quite literally a non issue. Storage is cheap af.