• tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    When software changes in a way the user dislikes there’s often no choice but to put up with it or stop using it, because it’s proprietary. I think this could be fixed if people were to adopt the value of free software and began to ditch proprietary software.

    • fart_pickle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      There’s nothing wrong with proprietary software as long as it’s respects user’s privacy and doesn’t do crazy licensing stuff.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It is very difficult to tell if a program is respecting user’s privacy without the source code to verify what it’s actually doing. When you can’t see or change what it does then the developer is the one in control of the computing, and even a good intentioned dev will have to resist the temptation to gain at the user’s expense.

          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Being open source doesn’t prevent the software being made with features one may dislike. It does mean you can actually investigate what data is being collected and decide if it shouldn’t be doing that.

            When I have installed Windows I’ve clicked “no” many questions asking if I was X feature on, and I could only hope it was respecting my wishes. It was probably still collecting data it didn’t even ask me if I could turn off.