Xatolos@reddthat.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoCloudflare once again comes under pressure for enabling abusive sitesarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkCloudflare once again comes under pressure for enabling abusive sitesarstechnica.comXatolos@reddthat.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squareRubberDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoThey don’t care. As long as their bills are payed they will host anything that won’t get them in legal trouble.
minus-squareconciselyverbose@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoThey shouldn’t care. Their job is not to control the internet. It’s to provide routing and content delivery. Responding to legal takedown notices is as far as they should go, and in a better system, would be as far as they’re legally allowed to go.
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoExactly. In fact, I’d prefer for services like Cloudflare to not know much of anything about their customers, aside from whether they’re legally allowed to use the service.
They don’t care. As long as their bills are payed they will host anything that won’t get them in legal trouble.
They shouldn’t care. Their job is not to control the internet. It’s to provide routing and content delivery.
Responding to legal takedown notices is as far as they should go, and in a better system, would be as far as they’re legally allowed to go.
Exactly. In fact, I’d prefer for services like Cloudflare to not know much of anything about their customers, aside from whether they’re legally allowed to use the service.