• FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Make the chambers share a central wick or ignition chamber.

    I also wonder if just firing 2 regular canonballs was effective

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The article/meme specifically states the canon was experimental and the canon never saw battle.

        Also didn’t ships already have canons capable of tearing down masts with chained balls by that time?

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The difference there, chain shot, is that the chain is still fairly short, because you can’t really get a large length of chain to reliably ‘unfold’ from a single projectile when fired. This beast had a chain that started unfurled, attached to each cannon ball, and long enough to go all the way down each of the barrels - making it, theoretically, have a massive spread of chain which could scythe down large numbers of troops in formation, instead of just a handful (for which one would generally prefer grapeshot, shrapnel, or canister).

            • Agent641@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              More beads. Like, 20 of them. Load one, put the others up my bum. Fire the cannon. Pure bliss.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      A common combustion chamber would have been better, but even then you have slightly different sized balls, different wadding with different amounts of friction, etc.

      I dont see why it wouldn’t work with just a regular cannon and two balls, linked by chain, stacked in series in the barrel.