So if Israel has known the entire time why wait until he was with his family to bomb?
The cruelty is the point
UNRWA Organizational Structure:
UNRWA is one of the largest United Nations programmes, with over 30,000 personnel working across five areas of operations, and is unique in that it delivers services directly to beneficiaries.
You can’t know everybody.
I used to work for a company that did background checks on every employee, and supposedly couldn’t hire anyone with a record over some kind of contracts.
Didn’t change the fact that several of my coworkers were ex-cons.
I think you can, actually. See: every corporation in America.
Are those the same corporations that were employing North Koreans via a VPN in Arizona or something?
Yes. All US corporations are doing this
You’re the one who said all US corporations are accurately background checking all their employees.
Don’t go getting pissy with them for proving you wrong.
What kind of headline is that?
Did he also deny beating his wife and kicking puppies?
Nowhere in the article does it say who is alleging the guy was a Hamas leader in Lebanon.
why prove it when Israeli intelligence saying trust us bro is enough for almost all the nations funding it
UNRWA seem to hire a lot of terrorists.
How many? Because at this point Israel has proven that less than ten were “Hamas terrorists”, and only one of those was proven to be an actual combatant and not just a desk jockey.
Over 30,000 people employed and not even 0.1% are terrorists.
Meanwhile Israel is a terrorist state employing hundreds of thousands.
Easy mistake to make, I suppose. I mean, whomst among us can honestly claim that they’ve never accidentally employed a terrorist commander?
It nearly happened to us last week. HR didn’t carefully review their job history where they called themselves an “Asymmetrical tactical strategist” on their resume. We only realized when, during salary negotiation, they wanted 70 virgins in their insurance policy.
I mean, we thought they were talking about the dudes in the IT department. Easy mistake.
Reuters - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Reuters:
MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
