If only something allowed you to use the typing system you already know, was able to be rolled up, doesn’t require you to already own a 3D printer and have knowledge of modeling software, and cost less than $50.
If only…
If only something allowed you to use the typing system you already know, was able to be rolled up, doesn’t require you to already own a 3D printer and have knowledge of modeling software, and cost less than $50.
If only…
I think what will hurt worse is that the genocide is still talking place and his sacrifice didn’t move the needle as much as he would have expected.
Maybe because Fox “News” is legally NOT a news organization but instead an entertainment organization. That’s not the place to have political debates, and presidential candidates shouldn’t be pushing to have debates for “entertainment” in the first place.
“I’m not president right now.”
Neither is she, dumbass.
“Make it so that… there’s an aunt or uncle who wants to help out a little more.”
I see a lot of people talking about how they’re trying to force grandparents to work until they die, which is completely fucked, but not enough people noticed how he’s trying to make people responsible for their sibling’s choice to have kids or not.
Basically, if you don’t already have generational wealth, he’s going to make it so no one in your entire family can escape the cycle of poverty.
Absolutely horrifying.
That’s not the fault of the user/students, though. They’re different tools. One is outright worse than not using it. Neither produce lasting benefits.
Headline: Screwdrivers better than hammers for screws.
Text: When craftspeople were trained using hammers with screwdriver bits duct-taped to them, they were able to perform the task, but were not able to keep pace with people using screwdrivers. Another team was given power drills, which were effective in practice. However, these did not produce any benefit once all people were given screwdrivers.
The study shows that once you remove the LLM though, the benefit disappears. If you rely on an LLM to help break things down or add context and details, you don’t learn those skills on your own.
I used it to learn some coding, but without using it again, I couldn’t replicate my own code. It’s a struggle, but I don’t think using it as a teaching aid is a good idea yet, maybe ever.
You skipped the paragraph where they used two different versions of LLMs in the study. The first statement is regarding generic ChatGPT. The second statement is regarding an LLM designed to be a tutor without directly giving answers.
A robot would have been less awkward. You don’t need to subject yourself to it.
Okay - good.
Not a single follow-up or explanation why he’s asking, either. He’s really building a rapport and drumming up enthusiasm with those interactions.
“…can happen to anyone…” “…would never ever in a million years…”
Well, which is it?