Russia was bombing civilian targets from the start.

Yeah all of my servers are on usff PC’s, so I get it.

If you do a hypervisor like proxmox, then throw your NVR in a VM, you can just create a couple of virtual NICs (though you’ll be back at that FW issue I’m sure).

USB NICs are pretty well supported these days though, and cheap to boot. Just need to be certain you’ve got usb3 if you want to make use of that gig though!

I’ve got a few pi-a-likes that I’m doing similar camera fun with, though using some webcams in there and a 3d printed case. At least that way they match my diy temp sensors with esp32s!

Dual nic NVR then? You could even just throw a simple switch with no uplink (but preferably managed so you can tag the traffic) and for extra safety just allow only the LAN traffic you want on the NIC/Port connected to your regular LAN from the NVR.

Nothing wrong with a DIY can though! As long as it works of course

Reolink, amcrest. Amcrest dont get anything starting with ASH in the model name.

If you want ONVIF, be sure to check the specs, many cheaper models drop support, but not all.

Some YI cameras have easily replaced firmware and can do rtsp too, but you have to do your homework on those models to be sure you’re getting one that can be modded.

You’ll still want to (IMO) toss any of them in a vlan without internet access, and rather than provide that vlan access to an NVR on another vlan, I’d lean toward your NVR having a second connection to that vlan. I’m a huge fan of segmentation though, so YMMV.

It just implies it.

The records of what she does, and the performative activism, which takes place entirely and exclusively during presidential election years - that’s what shows she isn’t putting in the work.

After repeatedly losing in Mass, the only time she runs for anything is for presidential elections. This also demonstrates she isn’t putting in the work, or she would have more involvement in more local elections.

That is about the most generic statement possible, with nearly zero knowledge of what I’m doing on yours.

So… What problem? Feel free to enlighten me.

Eh, I’d say mostly.

I have one right now that looks at data and says “Hey, this is weird, here are related things that are different when this weird thing happened. Seems like that may be the cause.”

Which is pretty well within what they are good at, especially if you are doing the training yourself.

Does Romancing the Foam have a kidnapped lounge chair and treasure hunting?

A dumb phone and a feature phone are not the same thing, and a feature phone may connect to the internet.

Well, as long as their eligibility/registration isn’t tossed under dubious means, there are enough polling stations where they live, they have the ability to go (as in not working or their work allows them to go), their vote sent by mail isn’t caught in a USPS black hole until right after the deadline despite being submitted long before, so on, and so on.

I still think that’s why Vance thinks Haitians are eating cats.

So, an actual answer if you’re interested.

No, the President does not have the power to remove him. When the Post Office was reformed into USPS in the 1970’s, the selection of Postmaster General is made by the Board of Governors of the Postal Service. These board members have 7 year terms, and are appointed by the President, with Senate approval.

The Postmaster General has no fixed term, and serves until the Board decides otherwise.

There are 9 members of the Board, and no more than 5 can be from the same party. The Postmaster General and Deputy Postmaster General are also voting members of the Board, though there are some things they can’t vote on.

Removing requires an absolute majority - so even though a quorum is 6, there needs to be 5 votes to remove DeJoy.

No member of the Board can serve more than 2 terms, and they can’t be removed without a gross violation - misconduct for example.

So despite the spongebob meme reference reply near mine, no, Biden can’t just remove DeJoy.

The US doesn’t want that either.

Be quiet, resident of “Further North Dakota”.

Especially since the folks who benefit from some water because they are in line for hours are usually the ones with not enough polling places, as in urban districts which typically vote democrat.

Yeah, its definitely fascist bullshit.

Giving food/water to people in line or on their way to vote is probably what they are referring to.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/nov/08/liquid-death/giving-water-voter-within-150-feet-ga-polling-plac/

Unrelated outside of the title… Pokemon Go to the Polls was a very fun bonus episode for dungeons and daddies

Related, I really hope the Taylor Swift fans register and vote (and more, but her fans are relevant right now considering the endorsement right after the debate)

Which is why dumb phones and feature phones aren’t common anymore, and the people choosing them are specifically choosing it to avoid being available via WhatsApp/Signal/Slack/Discord/Teams/whatever else.

My FIL for example has a clamshell feature phone, because he doesn’t want to be reached except by phone or SMS. He doesn’t want to read email or get messages on his phone, he wants to restrict that to when he’s in front of his computer.

So yes, you would not be able to use messaging clients on a dumb phone, that’s the idea behind their use today.

…so you just made it up then.

No, the phone industry made up these terms.

No one has done that. The only comments I’m downvoting are the ones spreading disinformation.

So how I read that is “Anything that isn’t what I want it to say is disinformation”.

Well, enjoy your day buddy, my participation in this thread is over. Its a neat feature phone, and that’s where I’ll be leaving that.

Several decades of phone technology as it developed…

Edit: and why are you just down voting everyone replying providing you with info?