Even though this would be a win for all Americans – and humanity – it apparently did not outweigh the politics of making a Democrat look good. This is the definition of party over country.

I’m a doctor.So is my mother. When she got cancer, I realized how little that mattered.

Republicans have stated budget cuts need to be made with an ever-growing debt. But where was this attitude when tax cuts for the wealthy were on the table in 2017? They don’t have to look at patients in the eye and break the devastating news that they have cancer. They don’t have to treat cancers that block intestines or drown a patient’s lungs in fluid.

    • Mia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That would not be democratic. It would be the exact same thing the GOP wants to do. Left branded totalitarianism would still be totalitarianism.

      • CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        Italiano
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Between left-branded totalitarianism and GOP I choose left-branded totalitarianism. An eye for an eye.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Republicans have a lot of blood on their hands and we should stop treating them as reasonable adults.

  • smokin_shinobi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Need to be putting this on billboards in red states. Let everybody who has lost family or has family battling cancer know what they have done.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Need to be putting this on billboards in red states.

      “The GOP just protected you from another vaccine”

      • Ænima@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not this time. Cancer isn’t communicative and there is no one alive who has not known someone battling or lost from cancer. It’s not a personal failing of the individual and it doesn’t give a shit who you are or how you live. It just might be the first time that a Republican voter could tangibly see how the wealthy and Republicans look to keep them dead, rather than do something nonpartisan.

        Fuck a “win for Joe.” They just blocked a win for humanity. We all know that in the end, you bet your ass the wealthy will have no problem getting their hands on this no matter the price or extremes they have to go to as soon as they are personally affected.

        Seriously, buy ads on every type of public media display possible. It could read:

        F#k a win for Joe!* Republicans in Congress just voted to let you and anyone you love die in the name of letting you and anyone you care about die from cancer!

        Call your local representative and demand they put their partisanship aside, because I’m sick of seeing good people lose their lives to something that we now have the power to stop for the benefit of all of humanity!

        I don’t know. Maybe throw out shit about how even beloved pets get cancer and die even sooner than we expect because of this shit. Maybe show a picture of a sickly dog shining down from a glowing halo. I’m just spit-balling here. You all get it!

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Cancer isn’t communicative

          No, but it IS environmental. And we’ve been flooding our air, sea, and soil with toxic waste for decades.

          That makes us a Hippie Green Issue, so Republicans oppose it.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Unless you’re spending all your money on cancer research, you can always spend more on it. At some point, you have to draw a line and someone will accuse you of deliberately refusing to cure cancer no matter where you draw that line. It’s plausible to me that the line should be where the Democrats rather than the Republicans want it, and it’s even plausible that Republicans are acting in bad faith. However, this article presents no evidence for either claim.

    • ganksy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think that’s a pretty reasonable response. Maybe not so much that cancer in general is over funded but I’d be willing to bet a breast cancer cure probably isn’t any closer now than it would be with another billion. It’s definitely a bad look for the GOP though. I see a lot of We the people… bs bumper stickers with the f*** cancer! stickers.

      • Quereller@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Spending one billion on breast cancer drug discovery/ development would probably lead to one more drug which increases survival by 10-20%. Or if spend on fundamental research it would lead to a lot of additional knowledge. Which might lead in about 10 years (and a few billions more) to a few drugs which increase survival a further 30-40 %.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      At some point, you have to draw a line and someone will accuse you of deliberately refusing to cure cancer no matter where you draw that line.

      I’m sorry, I can’t hear you over the $1T we spend on national security annually. Somehow, we’re always able to justify more than the year before.

      But $2.8B over ten years on an effort to improve health care treatments for one of the most deadly maladies in the US? My god! That’s over 3% of our Ukraine military aid budget! We need to draw a line somewhere!

  • lemmyhavesome@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Do you think Big Pharma wants a cure for cancer? Me neither. That might be the real reason it was voted down.

    • Emerald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It doesn’t seem like this program has anything to do with “curing” cancer. It’s just about preventing, treating, and researching. It doesn’t explicity mention animal testing on the whitehouse.gov page. I’d say its a program with good goals.

    • Mia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Look, you either kill rats or kill people. I love animals, it’s unfortunate we need to experiment on them, but it’s also naive to think we can make progress without doing it. At best one could make an argument for death row inmates to be experimented on, but that would be quickly shut down as unethical and there wouldn’t be enough anyway. There is no way around animal testing, we can only keep it to a minimum.

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah. When we fully fund holistic health care, that’s a win. Piecemeal isn’t a solution, and keeps people in desperation.

  • uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    There are many cancers. And many cancers already have cure. And many don’t.

    with an ever-growing debt

    Let’s be real here: American debt is so big, that it holds entire world economy hostage.

    • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Really shows how ass backwards the US really is.

      Cuba, a country that the US has tried to destroy for over 60 years now with economic sanctions, has better healthcare than the US, aka the richest nation on the planet.

      There is no excuse for the state of healthcare in the US. We really have some evil, greedy people deciding to let people die so they can have more money.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why can’t DEMOCRATS reach across the Aisle to Deliver for the American People?