• kevindqc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I haven’t used the app in a while and opened it and saw this… Well never buying Anova again

    But hey at least they gave me a coupon that expired two months ago.

    • Fester@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Imagine seeing that message and buying another product from them.

      “It’s time to artificially create waste. Don’t worry, you won’t see this message again. Our new cookers are designed to not last 10 years.”

    • SpacePirate@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Actively encouraging people to toss perfectly good hardware to fuel their subscription bullshit… and these guys weren’t even recently bought by a VC firm or anything?

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        They were bought by Electrolux in 2017, and have been enshittifying ever since. Cheaper, lower quality parts, etc. They’re just profiting from the brand as they turn it to shit. Never buy their products.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I can’t imagine why these things even need an app.

      You have to set the thing up with water and all, just hit the buttons on the device.

      • Kalkaline @leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The one and only time I used the app it lost connectivity and left my chuck roast in lukewarm water for who knows how long. Tossed it because I didn’t want to kill my family with food poisoning. It’s nice if you have a WIFI connected device, so you can put something on the counter in an ice water bath in the morning with the sous vide wand in there and flip it on before you leave work in the afternoon. Also seeing that the water has maintained an appropriate temp during a long cook is nice too. It’s a niche case use, but that’s why it’s nice to have it connected.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I will never throw a brick through the headquarters of Anova, nor would I advocate for others doing it.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have never bought an appliance or physical product that requires an app to use, and I never will until our society has deteriorated to the the point where there is no alternative to that in order to get by in it. It’s almost at that point already with smartphones but for now it’s still possible to get by without one.

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Wait

    “Our community has literally cooked 100s of millions of times with our app. Unfortunately, each connected cook costs us money.”

    The cooker, It’s FUCKING Bluetooth. It doesn’t need to call home, it can’t call home. The App, It has a list of 35 different sous vide recipes that could live on the app. The app has no business calling home, they don’t need a server.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They need if they were to push firmware updates via the app that are then installed over Bluetooth, like some headphones do. But that should be a free service, and also optional. I don’t really see any groundbreaking functionality added for a device that’s basically a submerged motor with a temperature probe.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s a decade old cooking appliance .

        What possible firmware updates could it need at this point?

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s a cooker. Why the hell does it even need bluetooth, let alone an internet connection?

      • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        So it can notify you when the water has reached the set temperature or the time you set for cooking is up. Which can be handy. However, I found the BT very weak on my Anova and it would lose connection when I went into my home office a mere 25’ away, so I stopped using it. There’s actually no need for the water to be up to temperature before you put your food in, and food can sit as long as you want; half the point of sous vide is to be able to hold food at temp without overcooking. So you don’t really need the timer either.

    • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Same. I’ve been thinking of replacing the cheap immersion circulator we have, and was going to go with Anova. This blatant enshittification is enough to make me look elsewhere.

      • MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ve had one for years, use it often and honestly didn’t know it had an app until today.

        • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Fair point. I just don’t like the move, and don’t want to support a company doing it. Even putting that aside, it really makes me worried that they’re at the point that they’re trying to ride on their reputation while increasing profit margins. It makes me think that, if I buy their newer models, they’re more likely to cheap out but charge more.

  • Media Sensationalism@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I passed on a lot of the fancier apartment buildings for requiring an app and a cell phone to gain access to your own home. I shouldn’t have to agree to an arbitration/class action waiver to use my own front door, I don’t feel comfortable with management getting a notification on their phone every time I come or go, I don’t like the fact that 20+ listed partner companies have access to sensitive personal data, and I shouldn’t have to wait for maintenance to show up in the middle of the night because I couldn’t make it back home before my personal tracking device died on me.

    The sad thing is that most of these locking units cost these apartments hundreds of dollars each on top of a monthly subscription.

  • harsh3466@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Translation:

    “Fuck you for not replacing your perfectly fine and still working 10 year old machine and making our line go up more. We’re gonna do our best to brick it because we want all of your money.”

    Fuck capitalism. I will (and have been) doing my absolute to avoid buying any kind of physical device that requires an app to function

    • __init__@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I will (and have been) doing my absolute to avoid buying any kind of physical device that requires an app to function

      Same. It’s becoming more difficult every day.

      • FMEEE@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        And that’s so sad. There are a lot of (mainly Elderly people) who don’t even have a smartphone who now often can’t use the most basic stuff necessary because it needs an app.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          A lot of this stuff is only useful if you have money, anyway. And poverty rates among the elderly have been climbing since the Housing Crash of '08

  • ripcord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I personally think it’s perfectly reasonable for a company to eventually start charging for a service they provide that costs them money to provide. They might bakenin some number of years into the product price, but they can’t keep providing the service for free forever.

    It seems like something that should be expected if we do want certain services to be provided and maintained. Heck, I also think that offering a subscription is better than the usual alternative, which is that the company just shuts the service down.

    However, the way this is done is almost always slimy and shitty and likely is only going to get solved by regulation.

    • It’s incredibly rare that IOT devices NEED cloud integration. Most of the time it really SHOULD just be local-only, or have a local option.
    • If they are going to start charging for something to continue to work, unless there was already an explicit agreement that - and when - this would happen, they need to provide an alternative.
      • Either documentation or open software for how an alternate cloud - including local - could be used instead.
    • That info really should be mandatory to be made available beforehand in case the company shuts down.
    • The subscription fee needs to be reasonable.
      • Personally, I think $24/year is still far too much, but it’s still WAY more reasonable than some I’ve seen.

    Should be a no-brainer.

    • OutsizedWalrus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Thing is they needed to factor this j to the cost of selling the device.

      It basically costs them nothing to ru the service for this device. If they failed to calculate that as part of the sale price, that’s not the consumers fault.

  • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I bet the app requires cloud hosting for it to run, and its starting to eat away at the profits they made.

    If it needs nothing but bluetooth, then this a pure money grab.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Usually, if it needs cloud hosting, it’s because they’re collecting your data. That presumably is a revenue stream for them.

      I have one of these, and I haven’t touched the app. Works perfectly fine without it.

  • auzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh ffs… This is the one I have…

    And, you know what? The firmware sucks.

    You can’t even connect to wifi if you have two AP’s with the same name (which is literally everyone).

    I haven’t even installed the app in ages because it’s a PITA and has never worked 100%.

    But, they can guarantee my next one won’t be an anova again. There are much cheaper alternatives now