• loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    I know someone said more or less the same thing when it was posted on Tumblr, but if the schools realize most of their students don’t know a thing they should know… Shouldn’t they teach it?

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      its not in their standardized tests and that’s the only thing that determines funding. Its a nightmare …

      • Lemming421@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Apparently it’s literally in the standardised tests… that’s what’s causing the problems! 😉

    • amotio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That is a good point, but analog clocks are IMHO in the realm of sundial clocks or audio casettes or floppy discs. Technology that was once usefull, but now it’s replaced by better alternatives. Time is after all just a number, and it does not matter how we choose to represent it.

    • leisesprecher@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Honestly, how often do you read analog clocks?

      I mean, I learned it as a child, but it’s been probably months since I actually had the need to read an analog clock, and I’m just not used to it anymore. I have to think about it, 20 years ago it was just my spine doing the thinking and it felt effortless.

      • loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        A lot, since I have an analog wristwatch and a wall clock. There were also analog clocks in several of the exam rooms where I last had exams.

        I guess many people don’t use them regularly, but regardless, the simple fact that they still exist is enough to be worth learning about them. Not everything you learn at school is meant to be used every single day.

      • The Dark Lord ☑️@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I actually agree with you. I can read an analog clock, but what worth is the skill? Most clocks are digital, and it gives me nothing more to read an analog one. People downvoting you is just silly. Some skills are allowed to die out if they add no value in modern life.

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Someone else made a comment and I think it’s great so imma plagiarize it-

          If kids are taught to read an analog clock early, which isn’t very hard to learn, they are getting a leg up on fractions, percentages, and geometry.

      • ramble81@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Every day? I use an analog watch face on my smartwatch, I have an analog clock in my car, I have another couple at home….

        • leisesprecher@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          So what? I don’t.

          I don’t have a smart watch and hardly anybody I know actually owns some analog clock?

          Take a look around you. Where are any analog clocks? Church towers, train stations, old people. That’s pretty much it. Your smartwatch is a choice. You could just as well use a digital watch face. There is literally no benefit in that case - except your personal preference.

          • ramble81@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            You literally asked “Honestly, how often do you read analog clocks?” and I answered. And then you say “So what?” So why did you even ask if you were gonna turn around and belittle answers?

            • leisesprecher@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              It’s called rhetorical question.

              I’d argue that you are a very small minority. Most people under 50 probably barely have any analog clocks around.

  • Anti-Face Weapon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t believe this for a second. You can literally just look at it and intuitively understand. Not to mention part of the standard elementary school curriculum is how to read a clock.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Wait…you think those are intuitive? Fuck no.

      Who’s going to intuitively know that “long hand pointing at 2” means “10 minutes after the hour”? Also, having the long hand for minutes is super unintuitive when hours are longer than minutes.

      • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        May not be super intuitive, but getting rid of them is intellectually lazy. If you know an hour is 60 minutes, it makes enough sense.

        If an hour is 60 minutes, 60/12 is 5 minutes per number on the clock. Long hand is minutes because there are more minutes in a day than hours. Or at least that’s how I can rationalize it.

        If you can explain an analog clock that quickly, it’s just lazy for them to not learn it. It also has cross application to make people more comfortable with mental math and multiples commonly seen in trigonometry.

  • Sol 6 VI StatCmd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Who cares. Analog audio, video, phones, all out the window. Next people will be complaining people don’t even know anything about vacuum tubes. Digital clocks are easier to read and make more fuckin sense. Leave the kids alone. 🙄🙄🙄

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Always feels like these articles (and headlines in particular) are made to stir up division on social media.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    OK let’s have a lesson for those who find this difficult. First, remember that little kids pick this up quickly and easily, so you can too!

    We all know there are 60 seconds in a minute, 60 minutes in an hour, and 24 hours in a day, right? and that the day is divided into the a.m. of 12 hours and the p.m. of 12 hours.

    So analog clocks show those 12 hours as the numbers 1-12 evenly spaced around the clock face. Now look a little closer and you see it’s also divided into 60 marks with a tick mark for each of the 60 seconds/minute or 60 minutes/hour. Hang on, we’re almost there!

    The little hand points to the HOUR number (1-12). If it’s in between two numbers, that means the time is in between those two hours.

    The big hand points to the MINUTE tick mark. Notice that the 1-12 numbers coincide with each 5th tick mark so it’s easy to count them. Just count by 5’s! So if the big hand is between the 3 and the 4, that means the minute of the hour is between 15 and 20, look at which tick mark for the exact minute.

    Now, can you figure out how the second hand works? Good! Kindergarten dismissed!

    /s

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I can tell the time perfectly well unless someone asks me what time it is. Then my brain is completely useless and I just have to twist my wrist around awkwardly to show them.

  • Korrok@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m a millenial and I can read analog clocks, but it takes me a few seconds, it’s not as instant as with digital ones.

  • Machefi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I know, it’s just a meme, but… The article. It’s about clocks during exams specifically, when students are under pressure and more likely to misread the time on an analogue clock.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Thanks for expounding upon that. It’s shit like this that gets spread around and older gens pat themselves on the back while shaking their head at the younger gen for not knowing something, despite it being taken out of context or even straight up false.

  • Rooskie91@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sounds like divisive bullshit.

    After all the millennial horseshit we had to hear in the 2010’s and we’re just gonna turn around and do the same shit, huh?